<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Arteaga2872's Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:55:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The theory of morality by Brae</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/the-theory-of-morality/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Brae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/the-theory-of-morality/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I agree, I think Aristotle is the best, and that we should never be at the extreme of either vices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I think Aristotle is the best, and that we should never be at the extreme of either vices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hobbe’s The State of Nature by kellymarie</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/hobbe%e2%80%99s-idea-of-the-state-of-nature/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>kellymarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/hobbe%e2%80%99s-idea-of-the-state-of-nature/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>I particulary like as well that it believed we are the same in ability. I like the outlook that what the human wants is not what he will get because we are all going for the same thing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particulary like as well that it believed we are the same in ability. I like the outlook that what the human wants is not what he will get because we are all going for the same thing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hobbe’s Social Contract by kellymarie</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/hobbe%e2%80%99s-social-contract/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>kellymarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/hobbe%e2%80%99s-social-contract/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I like how you mention there is a set of enforcers. I left that out of my summary of the social contract. I did mention we give our rights to the enforcer but forgot how important it is to have a powerful team of people to follow through with set guidelines...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how you mention there is a set of enforcers. I left that out of my summary of the social contract. I did mention we give our rights to the enforcer but forgot how important it is to have a powerful team of people to follow through with set guidelines&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kant&#8217;s duty Derived from Categorical Imperative by Boone B. Gorges</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/derivation-from-ci/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Boone B. Gorges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/12/derivation-from-ci/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious as to why you say that &quot;not everyone is capable&quot; of acting in a certain way.  Exactly what &quot;ways&quot; do you mean?  How does this relate to the idea of self-interest that you mention in the previous sentence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious as to why you say that &#8220;not everyone is capable&#8221; of acting in a certain way.  Exactly what &#8220;ways&#8221; do you mean?  How does this relate to the idea of self-interest that you mention in the previous sentence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kant&#8217;s Categorical Imperative by kellymarie</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/13/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>kellymarie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/13/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I DON&#039;T BELIEVE KANT TELLS US TO WILL ANYTHING IMMORAL INTO LAW. I BELIEVE KANT IS HELPING US DETERMINE WHAT ACTIONS ARE MORAL IF THEY WORK ALL THE TIME. IF THESE ACTIONS DON&#039;T ALWAYS WORK THAN CI TELLS US HOW TO ACT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I DON&#8217;T BELIEVE KANT TELLS US TO WILL ANYTHING IMMORAL INTO LAW. I BELIEVE KANT IS HELPING US DETERMINE WHAT ACTIONS ARE MORAL IF THEY WORK ALL THE TIME. IF THESE ACTIONS DON&#8217;T ALWAYS WORK THAN CI TELLS US HOW TO ACT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kant&#8217;s Categorical Imperative by titias</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/13/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>titias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/13/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I agree with your point there is not much that can be add kant way of thinking is correct in this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your point there is not much that can be add kant way of thinking is correct in this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kant&#8217;s Categorical Imperative by Alysse Congiusta</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/13/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Alysse Congiusta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/11/05/13/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Yes, in this case, the maxim cannot be willed into universal law.  Where there are no promises, the maxim doesn&#039;t work.  If a person borrows money from you one time and doesn&#039;t pay it back, the second time this situation comes up, you will not lend the person money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in this case, the maxim cannot be willed into universal law.  Where there are no promises, the maxim doesn&#8217;t work.  If a person borrows money from you one time and doesn&#8217;t pay it back, the second time this situation comes up, you will not lend the person money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mill vs. Kant by jgreen73</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/mill-vs-kant/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>jgreen73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/mill-vs-kant/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>I guess the only real way in which both Mill and Kant can agree would be whenever a good action turns out to be good. This way they are both satisfied as the purpose has met its objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the only real way in which both Mill and Kant can agree would be whenever a good action turns out to be good. This way they are both satisfied as the purpose has met its objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Breaking moral rules by Boone B. Gorges</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/breaking-moral-rules/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Boone B. Gorges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/10/18/breaking-moral-rules/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Do you think it would make a difference if there was &lt;em&gt;no one&lt;/em&gt; who loved JoJo?  Indeed, imagine that everyone in the world hated him, and that JoJo wanted to keep living, but only just barely.  Do these changes in the example make it OK to kill JoJo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think it would make a difference if there was <em>no one</em> who loved JoJo?  Indeed, imagine that everyone in the world hated him, and that JoJo wanted to keep living, but only just barely.  Do these changes in the example make it OK to kill JoJo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moral Fabrics by titias</title>
		<link>http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/moral-fabrics/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>titias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arteaga2872.wordpress.com/2007/10/15/moral-fabrics/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I think the first theory is important because is shows the gratification of higher priorities, and the act can be consider as right or wrong. I aslo agree with Mill&#039;s statement that lie can be lethal to society, when taking into consideration that society is based on agreement between poeple who expect others to be honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the first theory is important because is shows the gratification of higher priorities, and the act can be consider as right or wrong. I aslo agree with Mill&#8217;s statement that lie can be lethal to society, when taking into consideration that society is based on agreement between poeple who expect others to be honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
